Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Mayor Michael Bloomberg becoming a testy biatch


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/20/nyregion/20bloomberg.html?scp=2&sq=mayor+bloomberg&st=nyt

No longer touted as a potential president, beaten on his congestion pricing plan, watching plans for Moynihan Station stall, he's reverting to being a testy biatch who one time slammed a door so hard he broke the latch and locked himself inside the office, ending up asking the people he had slammed the door on to get him out.
Says the New York Times:
Comparing himself with other entrepreneurs in the autobiography, he wrote, “I too think I can do everything better than anyone else.” He added: “Still, my ego does allow for the remote possibility that someone might be as good at one or two little things. I’ve admitted there’s a slim chance that ideas coming from others could be valuable as well.”

Sunday, May 18, 2008

Transparency International Exposed For Venezuela Falsehoods

Transparency international is quoted in the major western media as though it's releases were from The Diety. This is a mistake. Oil Wars blog has exposed total dishonesty and/or ineptitude in TI's recent report attacking Venezuela's state owned oil company PDVSA. Click here to read what Oil Wars has.

Here is a sample of Oil War's devastating exposure of Transparency International's gross dissinformation campaign against Venezuela and its state oil company:

That is right - according to Transparency International PDVSA does not say how much it pays in royalties, taxes, what its revenues are, what its production costs are, does not have audited financial statements, etc., etc.It is simply stunning that Transparency International would have that as its finding for PDVSA because in point of fact PDVSA makes all that information and more public.

Just go to their web-site, click on "Informes Financieros" (on the right hand side of the page), and you will all their audited financial statements from 2007 back to 2000. Open any of those financial statements and you will find for that year ALL of the information that Transparency International claims PDSVSA doesn't make public. Just for the hell of it I opened the 2007 audit report and looked how it compared to T.I.'s claims: T.I. claims PDVSA does not disclose what it pays in royalties.

Really? On page 127 of its financial statement it says it paid $21.9 billion in 2007T.I claims PDVSA does not disclose what taxes it pays to the government.Really? On page 127 it says it $5.017 billion in ISLR taxes.T.I. claims PDVSA does not disclose what its revenues are.Really? On page 127 its says that revenues were $96.242 billion in 2007 (and they even break it down by external and internal sales if the idiots at T.I cared to know).

T.I claims PDVSA doesn't disclose its production costs.Really? On page 127 it says they had $14.9 billion in operational costs in 2007.

T.I. claims PDVSA doesn't disclose its development and exploration costs.Really? They are on page 35 and for 2007 came to over $11 billion.

T.I. claims that PDVSA doesn't have its accounts done in accordance with international accounting standards.Really? On page 148 the auditors say the financial statement was prepared in accordance with "international accounting standards".

T.I. claims that PDVSA doesn't have an audit done by external auditors in accordance with international standards.Really? On page 148 we see that the financial statements were audited by Alcaraz, Cabrera, and Vazquez, the Venezuelan affiliate of the U.S. accounting firm KPMG and they clearly state that the audit was performed in accordance within "international auditing standards". I could go on and on with this but I think the point should be abundantly clear.Transparency International said that PDVSA has a "Low" level of transparency based on claims that information is not made public when in fact that very information is very easily found in a couple of minutes on PDVSA's web-site.

Clearly this report by Transparency International is fatally flawed and its conclusions cannot be taken as valid because they are based on data which is wrong.If Transparency Internional was a serious and honest organization they would retract this report, redo it, make sure they got their underlying data right, and then release a new ranking. Then, and only then, might this ranking be worth something.

How could they have messed this up so badly? Two things are worth noting.First, for some unknown reason Transparency International farmed out the actual data collection to consultants. From page 34 of the Tranparency International report:

The data were gathered by consultants. The data-gathering process did not include interviews with any of the executives or staff of the companies, but was based on desk-research of publically available company documentation.

Maybe that explains it - without actually speaking to any PDVSA staff the consultants couldn't figure out that to get financial information they should click on the "Informes Financieros" button on the web-page!! [As a side note, this use of un-named and un-accountable "consultants" bears an striking similarity to the bogus exit polls during the Venezuelan recall referendum carried under the name of a prominent U.S. polling firm but which turned out to have actually been done by the an stridently anti-Chavez NGO called SUMATE. Maybe T.I. like to be able to say "oops, not our fault, the consultants messed up"]

Friday, May 09, 2008

If you're Black in NYC don't smoke weed, weed is for whites like Michael Bloomberg


In 2007 alone, there were 39,700 misdemeanor arrests for the possession of small amounts of marijuana. But such possession hasn't been a crime in New York State since the Marijuana Reform Act of 1977. Under that law, which is still in effect, an offender can usually expect to get only a ticket, punishable by a fine of not more than $100.

But most of the 353,000 New Yorkers arrested for having these small amounts from 1997 to 2006 got much more than a ticket: They were handcuffed, photographed, and fingerprinted, held overnight, arraigned in criminal court, plagued with permanent criminal records, and charged with the crime of having marijuana "burning or open to public view."

Since most of these people arrested had the pot hidden in a pocket, backpack, or purse, how did these stop-and-frisks turn into an arrest for "burning" marijuana" or having it "open to public view"?

As "Marijuana Arrest Crusade" demonstrates, this is done "by tricking and intimidating" suspects to take out the concealed marijuana, so that police officers can then claim they saw it "open to public view." In fact, a longtime Legal Aid supervisor quoted in the study says that this process happens "all the time." And such routine deception by the police to set someone up for arrest on a criminal-misdemeanor charge is perfectly legal.

There is much more detailed information in the report on the impact of these arrests, which—as described in last week's column— greatly and disproportionately affect black and Latino youths. Part 7, "Head Start for Unemployment and Prison," notes that these arrests "can limit the opportunity for young people to obtain employment and access to some schools, and for student aid."

The report also notes something that I've pointed out in this space before: "Mayor Bloomberg and other prominent politicians [and the FBI] have urged collecting DNA from everyone arrested for anything whatsoever, including, therefore, marijuana possession."

My main motivation as a reporter has never been to get "exclusives," but to get vital information out by all possible means. I hope this revelation of the NYPD's continuing disgrace will be read carefully by other reporters, legislators, and everyone else concerned with ending this racist crusade.
-Nat Hentoff, Village Voice


http://ww4report.com/node/5451

It seems NYPD is violating the spirit and letter of New York's marijuana laws (fines and violation for small amounts of weed) when it comes to Black people.

Bob Marley




Bob Marley

Poster


Buy at AllPosters.com


Weed is a no-no for Blacks in NYC but not for whites.
http://ww4report.com/node/5451
NYC marijuana busts racist —surprise!
Submitted by WW4 Report on Wed, 05/07/2008 - 03:06.
In 1994, the first year of Rudolph Giuliani's initial term as mayor of New York, 3,400 people were arrested for marijuana possession in the city's five boroughs. By 2000, that number had swelled to 51,500. This period and the ensuing years, which have seen a continuation of this policy under Mayor Michael Bloomberg—39,400 people were arrested in New York for pot last year—has been officially dubbed the "Marijuana Arrest Crusade" by Harry G. Levine and Deborah Peterson Small in a thusly-named report, subtitled "Racial Bias and Police Policy in New York City 1997-2007."

"Because of its large size and high rate of arrest," Levine and Small write in the introduction to their report, "New York now arrests and jails more people for possessing marijuana than any other city in the United States, and more than any city in the world."


Bloomberg at Rikers

Sean Bell murdered, hypocrisy lives on

Once again a court has ruled that when a New York cop feels afraid he may rapid fire dozens of bullets in any direction. That's the gist of the Sean Bell verdict as it was the gist of the Amadou Diallo verdict.

Of course cops fear black men, even black cops do. Mix this predisposition with alcohol and it's a serious problem. The scared cops who fired off fifty shots at three unarmed men had been drinking at the club, we'll never know how much they had been drinking because after the shooting their cohorts didn't give them a breathalizer to see if they were impaired, though the world knows that Sean Bell had twice the legal limit of blood alcohol for driving. According to Wikipedia, some of the cops shots " hit nearby homes and a train station. Five of the seven officers investigating the club were involved in the shooting. Detective Paul Headley fired one round, Officer Michael Carey fired three, Officer Marc Cooper fired four, Officer Gescard Isnora fired eleven, and Officer Michael Oliver fired thirty one times. [24][25][26]...Surveillance cameras at the Port Authority's Jamaica AirTrain station a half block away from the shooting site recorded one of the bullets fired by the officers shattering through the station's glass window and narrowly missing a civilian and two Port Authority patrolmen who were standing on the station's elevated platform.[20][31]"

Do cops drink on the job even when they are not doing undercover work in a bar or night club?
Here it is in the New York Daily News:
"SUSPEND DETECTIVES IN PARADE BOOZE RAP
BY ALISON GENDAR
Tuesday, June 14th 2005, 6:51AM
TWO NYPD detectives were suspended for drinking while on duty at the Puerto Rican Day Parade, cops said yesterday.
Detectives Edmond Olivacce and Bernard Dixon, both of Queens Narcotics, were working the parade in uniform near E. 76th St. and Fifth Ave..."

But most of them are fine upstanding selfless men who serve the community, right?

I dunno...

"THE SCANDAL AT MIDTOWN SOUTH: THE OVERVIEW; Police Used Brothel So Often, Madam Got Worried
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E00E7DD1330F93BA25754C0A96E958260&sec=&spon=
By DAN BARRY
Published: July 18, 1998
For as long as 15 years, New York police officers from the precinct responsible for eradicating much of the tawdriness from Times Square went to a neighborhood brothel for free sex, in uniform and while on duty, Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani and police officials acknowledged yesterday...

" One officer yesterday said the sexual activity was common knowledge in Midtown South. 'Look, everyone in here knew about it,'' said a six-year veteran of the precinct, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. ''We called it 'the apartment.' Should the bosses have known? Probably. But it's not like people are going to tell them. Not like these guys were dealing with drug dealers or hit men. They weren't hurting anyone. It was no big deal.'
Investigators said that officers even held occasional parties at the brothel, and that as many as 20 officers from Midtown South attended one such affair. "

The whole of Midtown South had to know about this. For one thing, in stead of patrolling the cops were sleeping, drinking beer and screwing gratis undocumented Mexican women who retained all of two hundred dollars a week for themselves.

So here we have a protitution investigation turn into a fifty shot disaster.

You know it's common knowledge that the upscale strip clubs of Manhattan are brothels where sex is sold and drugs can be located. Not to mention the underground...

Put five boozed up detectives with license to kill if scared, in the Hustler Club, or Scores, or Hot Lap Dance Club and see how that flies in the New York Times editorial boardroom...

Put four potentially frightened cops on a rush hour subway platform, give them automatic weapons and dogs that bite and that's a really serious problem. Michael Bloomberg thinks it's a good thing to do. And Michael Bloomberg rides the subway.

Michael Bloomberg has lots of opinions. He says it's okay that construction work proceed in spite of numerous serious safety violations.

Bloomberg's crazy rule that school kids' cell phones can be confiscated was being quietly ignored and circumvented by school officials on the ground who have schools to run, rather than a big mouth to run. Ultimately the usually servile New York City Council overturned his billionaire arrogant, no idea of what life is like, head up his ass, stupid rule.

More about prostitution and such:

Anyone with a brain knows that Eliot Spitzer was brought down and given a fate perhaps worse than death (he has kids for God's sake!) in his public humiliation not because he had sex with protitutes but because he messed with some very big boys.

My question is this: If Eliot Spitzer was customer number nine at the Emperor's Club online brothel, who were customers one through eight? Ten through twenty? Does it matter? Why should police, prosecutors and judges concern themselves with private activity among consenting adults? Now the cops who abused the Mexican slave women for fiteen years, they should have gone to prison for a long long time, but when an adult woman (or man) decides that s/he wants to trade sex for money why should that concern the government?

Isn't it a stupid wate of time to chase down these women (and men) and lock them up? Isn't it cruel?

And given the state of New York's economy (job growth negative, the main money coming in is from overseas, tourism is more and more important) why shouldn't we have a zone here to put Nevada and Amsterdam in the shade? Add to that decriminalizing marijuana, at least in a given zone like it used to be in Manhattan, and we'd have to build more hotels and another airport to accomodate the Europeans and others anxious to enjoy our cheap dollar and what it can buy. (Let's hope that by that time the Buildings Department actually protects the public and construction worklers).

My sympathy is with Sean Bell, his family, his friends, those who love him still. It's crazy and it's scary and it has to be changed, but it's legal for cops to shoot wildly when firghtened, even after drinking.


Dancer




Dancer

Poster


Buy at AllPosters.com



NYPD like wine, women, song, shooting

Mike Bloomberg, buyer of sex, weed


"I like theater, dining and chasing women. Let me put it this way: I am a single, straight billionaire in Manhattan. What do you think? It's a wet dream." Michael Bloomberg

Was it because he is a big strapping handsome man, so charming, so debonaire, so witty and likable that the life of Michael Bloomberg was (supposedly in the past as he described it) "a wet dream"?

(Mike is a scrawny little pipsqueek who was sued, (and had to settle) for harrassing female subordinates).

Why does Mike still have this "good guy" image? Could it be because no one, least of all a journalist, wants to be on the shit list of a man with five billion dollars and a media empire?
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/11274669/bloomberg_08_can_a_republican_mayor_of_new_york_take_the_white_house
Asked whether he's ever smoked pot, he beams and says, "You bet I did! And I enjoyed it." Pressed to reiterate his working-class roots, so voters will forgive him for being a billionaire, he refuses. "In New York City politics, there's a race to the bottom: 'My mother washed more floors than your mother, for less money.' I mean, come on." Bloomberg behaves like someone who believes he has discovered an alternate political physics, one where the normal rules don't apply.


Get A Life, Be Happy
http://wcbstv.com/topstories/Terrorism.New.York.2.244966.html

Bloomberg On JFK Plot: 'Stop Worrying, Get A Life'
Featured Slideshow: Gossip! Latest Celebrity Tabloid Rumors
by Marcia Kramer NEW YORK (CBS) ― While questions continue to arise about the alleged plot to blow up a fuel pipeline beneath JFK Airport and surrounding neighborhoods, some are questioning why New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg hasn't had a louder voice since the plot was foiled on Saturday.On Monday, Bloomberg finally weighed in, but his response was not what some would have expected."There are lots of threats to you in the world. There's the threat of a heart attack for genetic reasons. You can't sit there and worry about everything. Get a life," he said.

Giuliani's private, personal religion.

Black and White Nude




Black and White Nude

Poster


Buy at AllPosters.com



Does Giuliani like this stuff?
No one loves the spotlight more than New York's ex-mayor Rudy Giuliani, and of course not just anyone was at St. Patrick's Cathedral last week with Pope Bededict. It just so happens that the Cardinal of Rudy's church in these parts, a man named Egan, had told Rudy, or got Rudy to agree, not to ever take Holy Communion. Catholics have their beliefs. One is that abortion is a sin and that if the Cardinal says you can't take the Church's communion, well you can't. Rudy advocates a woman's right to have an abortion. I happen to agree with him, but I don't go around calling myself a Roman Catholic and I don't sneak or seek communion of the Catholic Church. But Rudy couldn't resist and so a priest who hadn't gotten the memo let Rudy sneak communion at the Cathedral when the Pope was there.

Rudy, bad boy! And since Rudy made the agreement he just broke in public with Cardinal Egan he's gone on to have a very public open adulterous affair and then gone and divorced his second wife to marry his adulterous consort. No problem with me and my personal religion but all no-no's for good Catholics who take communion.

Rudy has a right to his private personal religion and the Catholic Church has a right to decide who takes its communion and who is and is not a good Catholic. Giuliani, though, is shameless.

Or Does Giuliani like this stuff? Or maybe both?

"Suicide" Madam about her imminent demise, US prisons

Loaded - Peep Show




Loaded - Peep Show

Poster


Buy at AllPosters.com



Most men like this stuff, like it alot, but Eliot Spitzer has been destroyed, his wife and children traumatized, Deborah Jeane Palfrey either driven to suicide for her knowledge of the horrors of the US prison system that awaited her or else perhaps murdered, while clients one through eight in the Spitzer case are anonymous and Senator Vitter continues his "service."

DC Madam Predicted She Would Be Suicided Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Thursday, May 1, 2008DC Madam Deborah Jeane Palfrey predicted she would be “suicided” on several occasions both recently and as far back as 17 years ago - comments that now appear ominous in light of the announcement that the former head of a Washington escort service allegedly killed herself today.
“If taken into custody, my physical safety and most probably my very life would be jeopardized,” she wrote in August 1991 following an attempt to bring her to trial, “Rape, beating, maiming, disfigurement and more than likely murder disguised in the form of just another jailhouse accident or suicide would await me,” said Palfrey in a handwritten letter to the judge accusing the San Diego police vice squad of having a vendetta against her.
During several recent appearances on The Alex Jones Show, Palfrey also said that she was at risk of being killed and that authorities would make it look like suicide. She made it clear that she was not suicidal and if she was found dead it would be murder.
Palfrey had threatened to release the names of well-known clients of her upscale call girl ring in the nation’s capitol, and had indicated that Dick Cheney may be one of them.
“No I’m not planning to commit suicide,” Palfrey told The Alex Jones Show on her last appearance, “I’m planning on going into court and defending myself vigorously and exposing the government,” she said.
Developing…..
////////////

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24468091/

If indeed Ms. Palfrey was driven to suicide it is still a form of murder. While Ms. Palfrey faced a horrible prospect of imprisonment and all the violence and degradation she already knew goes with that in the USA, while her clients were getting away scott free, even remaining in the US Senate.

Here's food for thought:
Eliot Spitzer, a crusader against Wall Street corruption, Jewish but married to a Baptist, he clearly has a weakness for sex with young women with no emotional strings attached as does God Fearing Republican Senator Vitter who is "sorry" "repentant" and a good ole boy...

Thursday, May 08, 2008

A Solicitation in Support of Genocide

Is it not the goal of the Wiesenthal Center to “Never Forget”? Should that Center be concerned that a small but powerful group in Israel has executed plans to deprive Palestinians of their homes, their natural resources, their way of life, and their lives? Should that Center be working to change the government in Israel so that a new and peaceful agenda could be enacted? Should this Center that claims to be a champion of the oppressed demand of the United Nations that the Israeli government obey the resolutions that have been brought against it for its illegal actions, all 160 of them passed by the UNGA and 30 passed by the UNSC? Should the Wiesenthal Center be the first to recognize that Israel is not an equal among nations since it has defied every civilized international law of aggression, occupation and oppression in its dealings with the Palestinian people, the central tenets of the Geneva Accords, and the humanitarian doctrine all nations of the UN have accepted, the International Declaration of Human Rights? It should. That is its purpose, not the justification of evil. - Dr. Bill Cook



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

William A. Cook
World Prout Assembly
March 22, 2008

03/22/08 - "World Prout Assembly" - Within days of the fifth anniversary of “Shock and Awe,” I received a solicitation from the Simon Wiesenthal Center to help “Combat Global Hate against the Jewish People.” Rabbi Marvin Heir, Dean and Founder of the Center, presents a frightening picture of “institutionalized hate” that “has Jews feeling threatened and demonized. Many living in fear.” He decries in militaristic terms the “blatant attack” on Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish State, the “growing campaign against Israel” that “equates Zionism with racism and urges the elimination of the Zionist movement.” He then declares that the Wiesenthal Center “will go head-to-head with the haters and extremists, fighting their lies with truth,” from every one of their headquarters in Los Angeles, New York, Toronto, Paris, Buenos Aires and Jerusalem.” With the forces of the Wiesenthal Center and its headquarters around the globe enlisted “…we can stand … in this noble –and absolutely crucial – battle against the forces of hate. This is a struggle none of us can afford to lose.”

Would that the good Rabbi sought our love, concern, and compassion for all the afflicted on the earth; sought to mobilize human sympathy for the oppressed, the homeless, and the starving; sought to ignite heartfelt passion for beliefs that unite, not divide; sought a dialogue with those that see exclusivity a danger, not something to be celebrated; sought to bring together those that find fault with disproportionate force used against the defenseless; sought to understand the dishonesty of those that defy International Law and the Resolutions of the United Nations while they exert pressure to blunt criticism of that defiance; sought to seek solutions with those who criticize the actions of the Israeli State since they see injustice in Israel’s occupation of Palestine; sought to create an atmosphere that encourages dialogue the better to find solutions, not an atmosphere of conflict; sought, in short, the truth.

Seven years ago, before the regimes of Ariel Sharon and George W. Bush took power, the Wiesenthal Center had no need for such a solicitation. Seven years ago before Sharon and his entourage of 1000 desecrated the al Aqsa Mosque, before the explosion of illegal settlements poured over 400,000 immigrants on to Palestinian land in the West Bank and Gaza, before Sharon’s introduction of the lawless State that rid itself of rights of due process reverting to the barbaric practice of assassinations without arrest or trial by jury(228 targeted and 377 ‘accidentally killed), before the erection of the heinous, inhumane, and illegal Wall of Fear, before the exertion of disproportionate force that has cost the lives of 2400 infants each year in Palestine through deliberate, intentional and war criminal actions (see UNICEF website), before 4,604 Palestinians were killed by Israeli soldiers and settlers since September 29, 2000, a number greater than America’s loss of soldiers in Iraq, most of them civilians (2113-3044), many of them children (982) [figures from B’tselem], before Sharon’s ruthless siege with attending massacres of Jenin and Rafah, before his merciless killing of a wheelchair bound blind quadriplegic cleric in a crowded street as he and his hapless friends emerged from a Mosque after prayers, before indifference to human life became the standard of the Israel government that inflicted ID cards, colored license plates, 500 check points, humiliating lines to force delays, babies delivered in the streets because the mother was denied an ambulance, before racism became imbedded in the IDF mentality, before George W. Bush released Sharon to his savagery, there was no outcry of anti-Semitism against Jews, only that inflicted on their Semite brothers and sisters in Palestine.

Given this litany of inhumane behavior inflicted by the State of Israel on a population that has been systematically squeezed into ever smaller Bantustans of overcrowded, dilapidated, rubble strewn landscapes, deprived of water and sanitation, deprived of control of their own lives and resources since all ingress and egress is controlled by the occupying forces, since their economy has been trashed and unemployment has risen above 50% in the West Bank and 70% in Gaza, since they have no military forces, no government that is allowed to govern without US and Israeli intervention, and no access to the outside world, can anyone not expect normal people who seek knowledge about the oppression of the Palestinian people to be critical of the Zionist Israeli government and of the Jews that do not criticize?

Today as I write this account, Gaza remains under siege. Yet here is a Guardian report from January 23, 2008, a month ago. Add two month’s horror to this picture. “Gaza is on the threshold of becoming the first territory to be intentionally reduced to a state of abject destitution, with the knowledge, acquiescence and – some would say – encouragement of the international community. An international community that professes to uphold the inherent dignity o